Short answer is no, the tank is too close to the main pulley and the engine will need to be pulled.
Is this Albin's idea of a sick joke? There is maybe 3/4" gap between the fuel tank and the face of the main pulley. Can the tank be slid back 3" so he can get a socket on the crank? It looks like it's just sitting on the stringers with a jury-rigged bracket in the aft holding the tank in place but is there caulk or anything holding it to the stringers? Has anyone done this before?
I'm a bit frustrated right now with the very poor design and lack of access for MANY regular maintenance items (water pump, alternator belts, timing belt, rear main seal etc... ) Is my setup just really "special"?
My plan is to remove the decking over the tank, pump the fuel out and see if it will budge.. if that doesn't happen then it's the cutting torch and a new plastic tank or two fitted in a reasonable location. I believe this will be cheaper than having the engine pulled as it's a 2+ day process. In addition, if I go this route of having the engine pulled I won't be on the water for well over a month.
Thanks guys.......
Here are a couple pics of this outstanding engineering

Fuel tank right, pulley below

Aft Bracket

